|
|
Post by ibugly on Feb 10, 2011 20:31:39 GMT -6
|
|
|
|
Post by caretaker on Feb 10, 2011 20:48:12 GMT -6
I can see where this can become an issue. The state did the right thing letting the people who have had property damage hunt the elk. I like the fact that the people had to prove property damage get permission and abide by the rules. I also like the fact the wildlife officers are trapping and relocating the animals. A balance can be reached.
|
|
|
|
Post by ibugly on Feb 10, 2011 20:57:58 GMT -6
Another decade or so and they'll be wondering into places like Chuck Swan, Big Ridge, etc. The ones up at North Cumberland showed up in Clinton.
|
|
|
|
Post by caretaker on Feb 10, 2011 21:33:14 GMT -6
works for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by ibugly on Feb 10, 2011 21:38:20 GMT -6
Yea it would be interesting to see them populate into other areas.
|
|
|
|
Post by caretaker on Feb 10, 2011 21:45:51 GMT -6
They can be controlled if they become a problem.
|
|
|
|
Post by ibugly on Feb 10, 2011 22:02:54 GMT -6
Yea I imagine there would be some draw hunts happening.
|
|
|
|
Post by caretaker on Feb 10, 2011 22:25:56 GMT -6
yep, and property owners who have damage would be allowed to hunt the elk.
|
|
|
|
Post by ibugly on Feb 10, 2011 22:31:17 GMT -6
There's a lot of backwoods from Fentress County through Claiborne County along the mountains.
|
|
